Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
APLE · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #474 of 751 · scores higher than 37% of peers · safety percentile 37
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including APLE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio and beta than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | APLE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.51× | 0.82× | 71% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.93 | 0.69 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.29× | 1.20× | 12% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 470 | 104M EUR (≈$115M) | 37 | 42 | |
| 471 | 2.1B EUR (≈$2.3B) | 37 | 58 | |
| 472 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 37 | 42 | |
| 473 | 2.1B USD | 37 | 32 | |
| 474 | 4.4B USD | 37 | 49 | |
| 475 | 6.1B CNY (≈$851M) | 37 | 16 | |
| 476 | 230M EUR (≈$253M) | 37 | 24 | |
| 477 | 263M CHF (≈$302M) | 37 | 39 | |
| 478 | 4.8B USD | 36 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score