Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cellebrite DI Ltd.
How Cellebrite DI Ltd. stacks up
CLBT · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #843 of 1,667 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CLBT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.2% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLBT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLBT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 1.9% | 2.3% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 3.0% | 4.3% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 4.2% | 2.7% | 60% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 17.5% | 33.4% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLBT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 843 | 3.3B CNY (≈$466M) | 49 | 67 | |
| 843 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score