Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ATEN · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Ranked #843 of 1,667 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ATEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
| Metric | ATEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 2.4% | 2.3% | 51% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 4.1% | 4.3% | 48% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 3.5% | 2.7% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 13.5% | 33.4% | 18% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 843 | 4.4B CNY (≈$619M) | 49 | 56 | |
| 843 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) |
| 49 |
| 56 |
| 843 | 3.3B CNY (≈$466M) | 49 | 67 |
| 843 | 5.20T KRW (≈$3.7B) | 49 | 58 |
| 843 | 1.8B USD | 49 | 44 |
| 843 | 5.9B USD | 49 | 41 |
| 843 | 3.1B USD | 49 | 67 |
| 843 | 7.8B USD | 49 | 70 |
| 843 | 68.1B EUR (≈$74.9B) | 49 | 39 |