Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLBT · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #788 of 1,698 · scores higher than 54% of peers · safety percentile 54
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CLBT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLBT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.04× | 0.26× | 78% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.01 | 0.84 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.62× | 1.83× | 41% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 784 | 794.8B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 54 | 42 | |
| 785 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 9.6B USD |
| 54 |
| 42 |
| 786 | 18.8B USD | 54 | 64 |
| 787 | 1.0B CAD (≈$736M) | 54 | 63 |
| 788 | 3.1B USD | 54 | 67 |
| 789 | 5.2B CNY (≈$728M) | 54 | 39 |
| 790 | 144.4B JPY (≈$982M) | 54 | 61 |
| 791 | 1.5B USD | 53 | 84 |
| 792 | 610.1B JPY (≈$4.1B) | 53 | 47 |