Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cellebrite DI Ltd.
How Cellebrite DI Ltd. stacks up
CLBT · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
49/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #237 of 497 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score58 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CLBT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.2% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLBT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLBT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 1.9% | 1.9% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 3.0% | 4.0% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 4.2% | 3.3% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 17.5% | 22.1% | 40% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLBT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 233 | 536M USD | 50 | 34 | |
| 233 | 45.7B USD | 50 | 34 | |
| 237 | 1.8B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 237 | 5.9B USD | 49 | 41 | |
| 237 | 3.1B USD | 49 | 67 | |
| 237 | 7.8B USD | 49 | 70 | |
| 237 | 81.3B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 237 | 47.5B USD | 49 | 39 | |
| 243 | 2.7B USD | 48 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score