Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Methode Electronics, Inc.
How Methode Electronics, Inc. stacks up
MEI · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #826 of 1,667 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MEI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.9% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.5% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.5% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MEI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MEI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -6.9% | 2.3% | 10% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 9.0% | 4.3% | 77% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | -2.5% | 2.7% | 22% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 127.1% | 33.4% | 94% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MEI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 826 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 50 | 58 | |
| 826 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score