Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CDP · against 155 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #78 of 156 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 43
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including CDP · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CDP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 154 reported | 1.64× | 0.82× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 152 reported | 0.79 | 0.84 | 56% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 154 reported | 2.59× | 0.89× | 88% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2.4B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 74 | 3.58T CLP (≈$3.9B) | 45 | 66 | |
| 75 | 53.8B ZAR (≈$3.0B) | 45 | 59 | |
| 76 | 3.4B SGD (≈$2.6B) | 44 | 54 | |
| 77 | 7.3B USD | 44 | 58 | |
| 78 | 3.8B USD | 43 | 55 | |
| 79 | 16.1B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 42 | 37 | |
| 80 | 6.3B AUD (≈$4.2B) | 42 | 66 | |
| 81 | 3.2B CHF (≈$3.7B) | 40 | 35 | |
| 82 | 1.8B EUR (≈$2.0B) | 39 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score