Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRNO · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #422 of 751 · scores higher than 44% of peers · safety percentile 44
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including TRNO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta and current ratio than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRNO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.21× | 0.82× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.04 | 0.69 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.62× | 1.20× | 27% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 418 | 3.4B SGD (≈$2.6B) | 44 | 54 | |
| 419 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 378M NZD (≈$227M) |
| 44 |
| 57 |
| 420 | 688M USD | 44 | 65 |
| 421 | 1.8B CAD (≈$1.3B) | 44 | 60 |
| 422 | 7.3B USD | 44 | 58 |
| 423 | 15.2B USD | 44 | 66 |
| 424 | 290.6B THB (≈$8.1B) | 44 | 67 |
| 425 | 13.9B USD | 43 | 43 |
| 426 | 2.4B AUD (≈$1.6B) | 43 | 56 |