Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to COPT Defense Properties
How COPT Defense Properties stacks up
CDP · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #93 of 180 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CDP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 13.9% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 4.5% | 5.9% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 13.9% | 13.9% | 50% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 4.1% | 4.8% | 47% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 90 | 68.1B USD | 55 | 33 | |
| 90 | 435M USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 92 | 16.8B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 93 | 37.8B USD | 53 | 45 | |
| 93 | 3.8B USD | 53 | 55 | |
| 93 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 96 | 19.3B USD | 52 | 54 | |
| 96 | 430M USD | 52 | 34 | |
| 96 | 7.3B USD | 52 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score