Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CBIZ, Inc.
How CBIZ, Inc. stacks up
CBZ · against 576 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #282 of 577 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score79 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CBZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CBZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CBZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 574 reported | 3.8% | 4.4% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 584 reported | 7.9% | 7.9% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 193 reported | 9.1% | 4.2% | 81% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 575 reported | 62.9% | 43.6% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CBZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 276 | 1.3B CHF (≈$1.5B) | 57 | 35 | |
| 276 | 17.8B SEK (≈$1.8B) | 57 | 52 | |
| 282 | 257.3B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 56 | 50 | |
| 282 | 4.2B USD | 56 | 55 | |
| 282 | 3.0B USD | 56 | 51 | |
| 282 | 1.6B USD | 56 | 29 | |
| 282 | 2.8B GBP (≈$3.6B) | 56 | 57 | |
| 282 | 491.4B INR (≈$5.9B) | 56 | 79 | |
| 288 | 640.6B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 55 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score