Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CBIZ, Inc.
How CBIZ, Inc. stacks up
CBZ · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,042 of 2,394 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CBZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CBZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CBZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 3.8% | 3.8% | 50% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 7.9% | 7.0% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 9.1% | 3.7% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 62.9% | 50.5% | 61% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CBZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,042 | 140.4B JPY (≈$954M) | 56 | 67 | |
| 1,042 | 897.2B INR (≈$10.8B) | 56 | 45 | |
| 1,042 | 4.2B USD | 56 | 55 | |
| 1,042 | 533M USD | 56 | 39 | |
| 1,042 | 3.0B USD | 56 | 51 | |
| 1,042 | 28.8B USD | 56 | 73 | |
| 1,042 | 1.6B USD | 56 | 29 | |
| 1,042 | 814M USD | 56 | 26 | |
| 1,042 | 1.1B USD | 56 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score