Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CAE Inc.
How CAE Inc. stacks up
CAE · against 359 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #264 of 360 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CAE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 79% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -23.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 361 reported | 4.4% | 7.0% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 321 reported | -23.1% | 9.8% | 15% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 355 reported | 7.0% | 6.8% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 260 | 799.4B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 42 | 68 | |
| 260 | 692.3B JPY (≈$4.7B) | 42 | 46 | |
| 260 | 15.4B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 260 | 5.1B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 264 | 8.6B USD | 41 | 41 | |
| 264 | 6.1B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 264 | 4.5B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 264 | 8.8B USD | 41 | 54 | |
| 264 | 4.3B USD | 41 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score