Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to EnerSys
How EnerSys stacks up
ENS · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,405 of 2,400 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ENS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ENS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ENS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 3.7% | 4.4% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 4.3% | 7.1% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 0.7% | 4.2% | 34% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ENS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,405 | 8.6B USD | 41 | 41 | |
| 1,405 | 674M SGD (≈$513M) | 41 | 75 | |
| 1,405 | 319.2B INR (≈$3.8B) | 41 | 61 | |
| 1,405 | 2.8B USD | 41 | 81 | |
| 1,405 | 6.1B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 1,405 | 4.5B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 1,405 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 41 | 63 | |
| 1,405 | 2.2B GBP (≈$2.8B) | 41 | 59 | |
| 1,405 | 3.6B NOK (≈$338M) | 41 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score