Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BPYPN · against 183 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #91 of 184 · scores higher than 51% of peers · safety percentile 33
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)28 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including BPYPN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BPYPN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 177 reported | 0.93× | 1.12× | 60% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 179 reported | Not reported | 1.02 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 185 reported | 0.82× | 1.22× | 33% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.4B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 2 | 351M USD | 97 | 40 | |
| 3 | 3.4B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 5 | 27.8B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 87 | 739M USD | 34 | 45 | |
| 88 | 5.3B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 34 |
| 54 |
| 89 | 4.9B USD | 34 | 30 |
| 90 | 535M USD | 33 | 79 |
| 91 | Unavailable | 33 | 41 |
| 92 | 45.7B USD | 32 | 39 |
| 93 | 3.7B USD | 32 | 38 |
| 94 | 579M USD | 32 | 38 |
| 95 | 24.6B USD | 31 | 43 |