Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLDT · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #498 of 751 · scores higher than 34% of peers · safety percentile 34
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CLDT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta and current ratio than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.57× | 0.82× | 67% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.13 | 0.69 | 19% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.77× | 1.20× | 32% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 494 | 9.8B AUD (≈$6.5B) | 34 | 50 | |
| 495 | 329M EUR (≈$362M) | 34 | 47 | |
| 496 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.8B) | 34 | 56 | |
| 497 | 698.9B KRW (≈$503M) | 34 | ||
| 498 | 735M USD | 34 | 44 | |
| 499 | 306M EUR (≈$336M) | 34 | 53 | |
| 500 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 33 | 65 | |
| 501 | 2.2B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 33 | 51 | |
| 502 | 5.2B USD | 33 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score