Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BJ's Restaurants, Inc.
How BJ's Restaurants, Inc. stacks up
BJRI · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #564 of 1,586 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including BJRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.1% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 84% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 54.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BJRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BJRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 3.5% | 3.7% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | 54.7% | 4.1% | 84% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 2.1% | 4.3% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BJRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 564 | 15.3B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 64 | 50 | |
| 564 | 581.4B JPY (≈$4.0B) | 64 | 73 | |
| 564 | 6.7B USD | 64 | 65 | |
| 564 | 131.5B INR (≈$1.6B) | 64 | 55 | |
| 564 | 1.3B USD | 64 | 44 | |
| 564 | 8.0B USD | 64 | 48 | |
| 564 | 72.8B USD | 64 | 50 | |
| 564 | 1.9B USD | 64 | 55 | |
| 564 | 27.1B USD | 64 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score