Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ulta Beauty, Inc.
How Ulta Beauty, Inc. stacks up
ULTA · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #564 of 1,586 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including ULTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 77% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ULTA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ULTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 11.2% | 3.7% | 77% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | 5.6% | 4.1% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 6.5% | 4.3% | 60% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ULTA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 564 | 1.3B USD | 64 | 44 | |
| 564 | 8.0B USD | 64 | 48 | |
| 564 | 72.8B USD | 64 | 50 | |
| 564 | 1.9B USD | 64 | 55 | |
| 564 | 27.1B USD | 64 | 58 | |
| 564 | 6.2B EUR (≈$6.8B) | 64 | 49 | |
| 580 | 4.1B HKD (≈$522M) | 63 | 65 | |
| 580 | 44.0B JPY (≈$299M) | 63 | 62 | |
| 580 | 3.8B CNY (≈$531M) | 63 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score