Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
How Abercrombie & Fitch Co. stacks up
ANF · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #564 of 1,586 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including ANF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.5% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ANF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ANF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 4.7% | 3.7% | 55% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | 12.0% | 4.1% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 11.5% | 4.3% | 76% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ANF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 564 | 77.4B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 64 | 50 | |
| 564 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 64 | 75 | |
| 564 | 15.3B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 64 | 50 | |
| 564 | 581.4B JPY (≈$4.0B) | 64 | 73 | |
| 564 | 6.7B USD | 64 | 65 | |
| 564 | 131.5B INR (≈$1.6B) | 64 | 55 | |
| 564 | 1.3B USD | 64 | 44 | |
| 564 | 8.0B USD | 64 | 48 | |
| 564 | 72.8B USD | 64 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score