Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Avery Dennison Corporation
How Avery Dennison Corporation stacks up
AVY · against 153 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #108 of 154 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including AVY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AVY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AVY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 154 reported | 5.8% | 7.7% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 135 reported | 2.0% | 8.1% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 153 reported | 2.9% | 9.0% | 24% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AVY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 102 | 10.7B USD | 50 | 50 | |
| 102 | 155.0B SEK (≈$15.5B) | 50 | 71 | |
| 102 | 271.2B MXN (≈$14.6B) | 50 | 70 | |
| 108 | 1.46T JPY (≈$9.9B) | 49 | 62 | |
| 108 | 14.0B USD | 49 | 47 | |
| 108 | 7.5B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 111 | 8.6B USD | 48 | 55 | |
| 111 | 147.3B MXN (≈$8.0B) | 48 | 73 | |
| 113 | 12.2B USD | 47 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score