Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
How Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. stacks up
ASO · against 318 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
86/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #32 of 319 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score34 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including ASO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 18.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 320 reported | 9.8% | 5.4% | 86% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 326 reported | 12.9% | 9.5% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 134 reported | 8.8% | 5.8% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 323 reported | 57.7% | 42.4% | 61% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 28 | 13.9B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 88 | 56 | |
| 29 | 77.2B THB (≈$2.2B) | 87 | 64 | |
| 29 | 1.9B USD | 87 | 55 | |
| 29 | 2.5B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 87 | 60 | |
| 32 | 3.7B USD | 86 | 66 | |
| 32 | 4.8B USD | 86 | 67 | |
| 34 | 3.6B USD | 85 | 54 | |
| 34 | 2.5B USD | 85 | 59 | |
| 36 | 21.8B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 84 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score