Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Amazon.com, Inc.
How Amazon.com, Inc. stacks up
AMZN · against 1,557 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,052 of 1,558 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including AMZN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.4% vs peer median 6.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMZN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMZN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,529 reported | 4.8% | 4.4% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,595 reported | 5.8% | 8.8% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 571 reported | -0.1% | 6.2% | 20% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,468 reported | 19.7% | 54.0% | 17% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMZN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 210.5B KRW (≈$152M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 553.9B KRW (≈$399M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 444.9B KRW (≈$320M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 1.91T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 33M MYR (≈$7M) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1,052 | 5.3B CNY (≈$742M) | 32 | 59 | |
| 1,052 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score