Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMZN · against 1,589 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,163 of 1,590 · scores higher than 27% of peers · safety percentile 27
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including AMZN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AMZN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,524 reported | 0.46× | 0.50× | 53% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,574 reported | 1.46 | 0.56 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,541 reported | 1.03× | 1.49× | 26% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.9B CNY (≈$549M) | 100 | 43 | |
| 2 | 273M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 62 | |
| 3 | 311M MYR (≈$68M) | 100 | 51 | |
| 3 | 602M SAR (≈$163M) | 100 | 33 | |
| 3 | 308M MYR (≈$68M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 1,159 | 206M HKD (≈$26M) | 27 | 34 | |
| 1,160 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 473.6B KRW (≈$341M) |
| 27 |
| 55 |
| 1,161 | 125M AUD (≈$82M) | 27 | 37 |
| 1,162 | 15.8B USD | 27 | 55 |
| 1,163 | 2.80T USD | 27 | 58 |
| 1,164 | 32.3B ZAR (≈$1.8B) | 27 | 55 |
| 1,165 | 35.9B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 27 | 47 |
| 1,166 | 8.3B USD | 27 | 68 |
| 1,167 | 245M EUR (≈$269M) | 27 | 49 |