Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMZN · against 1,605 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #250 of 1,606 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score161 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including AMZN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | AMZN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,513 reported | 12.2% | 7.3% | 70% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,596 reported | 12.1% | 6.4% | 75% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,523 reported | 12.3% | 3.3% | 94% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,473 reported | 30.6% | 7.6% | 92% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,615 reported | 50.8% | 29.9% | 80% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.47T JPY (≈$10.0B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 1 | 362.9B INR (≈$4.4B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1.12T TWD (≈$34.8B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 975.0B JPY (≈$6.6B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 250 | 74.6B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 84 | 50 | |
| 250 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 190.0B CNY (≈$26.6B) |
| 84 |
| 70 |
| 250 | 6.4B CNY (≈$898M) | 84 | 77 |
| 250 | 2.4B CNY (≈$342M) | 84 | 67 |
| 250 | 2.80T USD | 84 | 58 |
| 250 | 2.1B USD | 84 | 83 |
| 250 | 135.7B INR (≈$1.6B) | 84 | 60 |
| 250 | 5.9B EUR (≈$6.5B) | 84 | 58 |
| 250 | 2.2B SGD (≈$1.6B) | 84 | 75 |