Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMH · against 81 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #22 of 82 · scores higher than 74% of peers · safety percentile 58
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including AMH · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AMH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 81 reported | 0.69× | 0.72× | 59% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 81 reported | 0.79 | 0.83 | 59% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 79 reported | 1.67× | 0.76× | 74% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.5B HKD (≈$7.7B) | 94 | 54 | |
| 2 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 90 | 78 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 89 | 80 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 5 | 17.6B USD | 87 | 37 | |
| 18 | 14.8B USD | 65 | 51 | |
| 19 | 12.0B USD | 65 | 61 | |
| 20 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 64 | 67 | |
| 21 | 10.8B AUD (≈$7.2B) | 63 | 65 | |
| 22 | 12.9B USD | 58 | 55 | |
| 23 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 58 | 63 | |
| 24 | 662.0B INR (≈$7.9B) | 55 | 62 | |
| 25 | 10.1B AUD (≈$6.7B) | 54 | 54 | |
| 26 | 8.6B USD | 52 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score