Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ADC · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #359 of 751 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including ADC · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta and debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ADC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.59× | 0.82× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.42 | 0.69 | 67% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.27× | 1.20× | 11% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 355 | 1.5B NZD (≈$884M) | 53 | 58 | |
| 356 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 58M MYR (≈$13M) |
| 53 |
| 36 |
| 357 | 217.5B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 53 | 43 |
| 358 | 547.3B JPY (≈$3.7B) | 52 | 52 |
| 359 | 8.6B USD | 52 | 56 |
| 360 | 9.7B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 52 | 20 |
| 361 | 7.4B USD | 52 | 46 |
| 362 | 1.7B USD | 52 | 50 |
| 363 | 610M EUR (≈$671M) | 52 | 67 |