Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZS · against 110 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #67 of 111 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ZS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ZS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 106 reported | 0.72× | 0.32× | 28% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 107 reported | 0.95 | 1.18 | 64% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 109 reported | 1.70× | 1.67× | 53% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 3 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 4 | 40.5B USD | 91 | 75 | |
| 5 | 28.4B USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 63 | 133.6B CNY (≈$18.7B) | 30 | 50 | |
| 64 | 26.1B EUR (≈$28.7B) | 30 | 56 | |
| 65 | 21.1B USD | 30 | 70 | |
| 66 | 28.3B USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 67 | 36.7B USD | 28 | 36 | |
| 68 | 4.52T JPY (≈$30.8B) | 28 | 52 | |
| 69 | 32.8B USD | 28 | 66 | |
| 70 | 20.2B USD | 28 | 50 | |
| 71 | 40.6B USD | 27 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score