Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TSEM · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #102 of 1,698 · scores higher than 94% of peers · safety percentile 94
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including TSEM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TSEM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.05× | 0.26× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.89 | 0.84 | 47% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 4.91× | 1.83× | 90% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 98 | 55.7B INR (≈$669M) | 94 | 86 | |
| 99 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 100 | 4.1B USD | 94 | 67 | |
| 101 | 740M USD | 94 | 26 | |
| 102 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 103 | 1.08T USD | 94 | 84 | |
| 104 | 8.0B USD | 94 | 51 | |
| 105 | 7.0B CNY (≈$980M) | 94 | 27 | |
| 106 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score