Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FTV · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,229 of 1,698 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including FTV · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.59× | 0.26× | 29% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.99 | 0.84 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.24× | 1.83× | 23% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,225 | 108.7B USD | 28 | 55 | |
| 1,226 | 454M USD | 28 | 13 | |
| 1,227 | 491.0B TWD (≈$15.2B) | 28 | 41 | |
| 1,228 | 24.7B SEK (≈$2.5B) | 28 | 56 | |
| 1,229 | 20.2B USD | 28 | 50 | |
| 1,230 | 35.7B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 28 | 31 | |
| 1,231 | 4.1B CNY (≈$573M) | 28 | 37 | |
| 1,232 | 916M USD | 27 | 29 | |
| 1,233 | 3.7B SEK (≈$367M) | 27 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score