Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZM · against 137 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #12 of 138 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 83
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including ZM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ZM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 131 reported | 0.01× | 0.34× | 97% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 134 reported | 1.04 | 1.14 | 55% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 136 reported | 3.83× | 1.62× | 90% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 4 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 8 | 176.1B CNY (≈$24.7B) | 87 | 78 | |
| 9 | 646.8B TWD (≈$20.1B) | 87 | 70 | |
| 10 | 888.4B TWD (≈$27.5B) | 85 | 73 | |
| 11 | 1.59T INR (≈$19.0B) | 84 | 67 | |
| 12 | 26.8B USD | 83 | 85 | |
| 13 | 32.8B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 14 | 323.5B CNY (≈$45.3B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 15 | 27.0B USD | 80 | 55 | |
| 16 | 52.3B USD | 79 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score