Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GRMN · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #361 of 1,698 · scores higher than 79% of peers · safety percentile 79
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including GRMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GRMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.03× | 0.26× | 84% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.87 | 0.84 | 48% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 3.03× | 1.83× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 357 | 5.5B CNY (≈$777M) | 79 | 67 | |
| 358 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.7B CNY (≈$940M) |
| 79 |
| 28 |
| 359 | 5.6B CNY (≈$790M) | 79 | 49 |
| 360 | 124.6B JPY (≈$847M) | 79 | 69 |
| 361 | 52.3B USD | 79 | 74 |
| 362 | 2.2B USD | 79 | 60 |
| 363 | 6.1B INR (≈$73M) | 79 | 56 |
| 364 | 2.9B HKD (≈$375M) | 79 | 36 |
| 365 | 499M SGD (≈$380M) | 79 | 65 |