Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Garmin Ltd.
How Garmin Ltd. stacks up
GRMN · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #743 of 1,667 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GRMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GRMN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GRMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 3.6% | 2.3% | 64% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 4.6% | 4.3% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 3.1% | 2.7% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 17.2% | 33.4% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GRMN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 743 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 55 | 44 | |
| 743 | 408M USD | 55 | 47 | |
| 743 | 32.8B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 743 | 3.7B USD | 55 | 67 | |
| 743 | 52.3B USD | 55 | 74 | |
| 743 | 151M USD | 55 | 33 | |
| 743 | 689M EUR (≈$758M) | 55 | 36 | |
| 760 | 41.0B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 54 | 55 | |
| 760 | 6.3B CNY (≈$881M) | 54 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score