Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Zebra Technologies Corporation
How Zebra Technologies Corporation stacks up
ZBRA · against 181 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
46/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #137 of 182 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ZBRA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.1% vs peer median 4.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.7% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.7% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZBRA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZBRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 184 reported | 12.7% | 16.2% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 158 reported | 5.7% | 18.9% | 33% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | 2.1% | 10.5% | 21% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZBRA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 133 | 30.8B USD | 48 | 59 | |
| 133 | 17.8B USD | 48 | 25 | |
| 136 | 16.8B USD | 47 | 66 | |
| 137 | 28.4B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 137 | 15.6B USD | 46 | 48 | |
| 139 | 114.4B CNY (≈$16.0B) | 45 | 51 | |
| 140 | 1.27T JPY (≈$8.6B) | 44 | 69 | |
| 141 | 1.59T INR (≈$19.0B) | 43 | 67 | |
| 142 | 271.0B TWD (≈$8.4B) | 42 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score