Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Yelp Inc.
How Yelp Inc. stacks up
YELP · against 146 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #91 of 147 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including YELP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -1.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = YELP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | YELP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | 1.5% | 5.8% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | -1.4% | 9.4% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 145 reported | 5.1% | 4.7% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around YELP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 648M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 4 | 639M USD | 98 | 46 | |
| 89 | 9.0B USD | 47 | 53 | |
| 90 | 3.6B USD | 46 | 22 | |
| 91 | 37.7B USD | 45 | 58 | |
| 91 | 14.0B USD | 45 | 44 | |
| 91 | 1.1B USD | 45 | 73 | |
| 94 | 388M USD | 43 | 29 | |
| 94 | 659M USD | 43 | 81 | |
| 94 | 25.1B USD | 43 | 66 | |
| 97 | 474M USD | 42 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score