Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Match Group, Inc.
How Match Group, Inc. stacks up
MTCH · against 495 other Communication Services companies
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #261 of 496 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score50 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including MTCH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 64% of peers. Revenue growth: 0.2% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 17.8% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTCH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTCH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 502 reported | 0.2% | 3.0% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 278 reported | 17.8% | 8.8% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 491 reported | 3.0% | 3.0% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTCH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.7B CNY (≈$13.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 4 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 4 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 256 | 743M USD | 48 | 67 | |
| 256 | 324M USD | 48 | 25 | |
| 261 | 5.3B EUR (≈$5.8B) | 47 | 46 | |
| 261 | 16.2B INR (≈$194M) | 47 | 51 | |
| 261 | 9.0B USD | 47 | 53 | |
| 261 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 47 | 61 | |
| 261 | 111.0B SEK (≈$11.1B) | 47 | 57 | |
| 266 | 9.5B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 46 | 27 | |
| 266 | 1.94T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 46 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score