Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Yelp Inc.
How Yelp Inc. stacks up
YELP · against 495 other Communication Services companies
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #271 of 496 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score50 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including YELP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -1.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = YELP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | YELP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 502 reported | 1.5% | 3.0% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 278 reported | -1.4% | 8.8% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 491 reported | 5.1% | 3.0% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around YELP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.7B CNY (≈$13.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 4 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 4 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 271 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 45 | 66 | |
| 271 | 28.1B MYR (≈$6.2B) | 45 | 52 | |
| 271 | 37.7B USD | 45 | 58 | |
| 271 | 14.0B USD | 45 | 44 | |
| 271 | 1.1B USD | 45 | 73 | |
| 276 | 1.90T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 44 | 73 | |
| 276 | 12.9B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 44 | 42 | |
| 276 | 7.3B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 44 | 40 | |
| 276 | 1.03T INR (≈$12.3B) | 44 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score