Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Xylem Inc.
How Xylem Inc. stacks up
XYL · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #781 of 2,400 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including XYL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 13.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 83% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.6% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XYL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XYL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 4.5% | 4.4% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 13.1% | 7.1% | 59% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 14.6% | 4.2% | 83% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XYL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 781 | 29.8B EUR (≈$32.8B) | 67 | 54 | |
| 781 | 3.7B USD | 67 | 78 | |
| 781 | 719M NZD (≈$431M) | 67 | 66 | |
| 781 | 6.6B USD | 67 | 42 | |
| 781 | 22.5B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 781 | 15.2B USD | 67 | 74 | |
| 805 | 17.0B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 66 | 60 | |
| 805 | 5.9B CNY (≈$822M) | 66 | 43 | |
| 805 | 284.0B JPY (≈$1.9B) | 66 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score