Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Xylem Inc.
How Xylem Inc. stacks up
XYL · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #186 of 446 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including XYL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 13.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 83% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.6% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XYL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XYL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 4.5% | 8.4% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 13.1% | 9.2% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 14.6% | 5.2% | 79% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XYL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 183 | 3.0B USD | 68 | 62 | |
| 183 | Unavailable | 68 | 72 | |
| 186 | 3.7B USD | 67 | 78 | |
| 186 | 6.6B USD | 67 | 42 | |
| 186 | 22.5B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 186 | 15.2B USD | 67 | 74 | |
| 190 | 687M USD | 66 | 70 | |
| 190 | 2.8B USD | 66 | 52 | |
| 190 | 5.9B USD | 66 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score