Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
XOM · against 386 other Energy companies
Ranked #250 of 387 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including XOM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
| Metric | XOM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 4.7% | 5.6% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 9.5% | 12.2% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 243 reported | 4.5% | 6.1% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 358 reported | 38.5% | 58.7% | 25% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.39T KRW (≈$9.6B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 581M CAD (≈$424M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.1B MYR (≈$463M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 3 | 1.6B MYR (≈$349M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 3 | 969M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 247 | 8.5B EUR (≈$9.4B) | 36 | 39 | |
| 250 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 10.7B CNY (≈$1.5B) |
| 35 |
| 31 |
| 250 | 71.2B USD | 35 | 44 |
| 250 | 445M USD | 35 | 42 |
| 250 | 674.6B USD | 35 | 59 |
| 254 | 6.5B USD | 34 | 38 |
| 254 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 34 | 47 |
| 254 | 370.1B BRL (≈$66.6B) | 34 | 42 |
| 254 | 27.7B AUD (≈$18.3B) | 34 | 39 |