Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
How ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation stacks up
XOM · against 399 other Energy companies
Profitability
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #143 of 400 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score40 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including XOM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 15.9% vs peer median 12.0%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 70% of peers. Return on invested capital: 15.5% vs peer median 9.2%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 73% of peers. Return on assets: 7.1% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XOM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XOM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 383 reported | 15.5% | 9.2% | 70% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 396 reported | 15.9% | 12.0% | 60% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 390 reported | 7.1% | 4.5% | 73% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 383 reported | 12.6% | 10.4% | 57% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 29.8% | 33.2% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XOM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.9B EUR (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 23.9B USD | 100 | 71 | |
| 3 | 6.25T SAR (≈$1.69T) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 395M EUR (≈$434M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 139 | 332M USD | 65 | 65 | |
| 143 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score