Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
XEL · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #243 of 360 · scores higher than 33% of peers · safety percentile 33
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including XEL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | XEL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 1.73× | 1.21× | 24% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.40 | 0.40 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 0.70× | 1.05× | 23% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 239 | 15.4B USD | 34 | 54 | |
| 240 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 26.9B USD |
| 33 |
| 50 |
| 241 | 18.8B CNY (≈$2.6B) | 33 | 49 |
| 242 | 36.1B CNY (≈$5.1B) | 33 | 60 |
| 243 | 49.2B USD | 33 | 38 |
| 244 | 1.1B USD | 32 | 51 |
| 245 | 7.4B EUR (≈$8.2B) | 32 | 49 |
| 246 | 411.9B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 32 | 41 |
| 247 | 46.3B THB (≈$1.3B) | 31 | 30 |