Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Xcel Energy Inc.
How Xcel Energy Inc. stacks up
XEL · against 351 other Utilities companies
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #179 of 352 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including XEL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Utilities peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 69% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.4% vs peer median 2.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.0% vs peer median 1.7%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 75% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.1% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XEL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XEL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | 9.1% | 2.5% | 75% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 284 reported | 2.0% | 1.6% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 351 reported | -1.4% | 2.0% | 31% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XEL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 175 | 6.7B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 175 | 46.9B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 179 | 53.6B JPY (≈$365M) | 49 | 84 | |
| 179 | 4.6B EUR (≈$5.0B) | 49 | 43 | |
| 179 | 49.2B USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 182 | 207.1B KRW (≈$149M) | 48 | 50 | |
| 182 | 75.9B JPY (≈$516M) | 48 | 73 | |
| 182 | 3.12T INR (≈$37.4B) | 48 | 62 | |
| 182 | 4.9B USD | 48 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score