Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
How Williams-Sonoma, Inc. stacks up
WSM · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #241 of 356 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including WSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.4% vs peer median 8.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.4% vs peer median 6.0%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 3.8% | 4.1% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 5.4% | 8.3% | 27% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 4.4% | 5.2% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 6.1% | 36.2% | 18% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 62M USD | 98 | 79 | |
| 3 | 7.9B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.3B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 400M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 238 | 86.3B USD | 35 | 52 | |
| 241 | 454M USD | 34 | 29 | |
| 241 | 47.1B USD | 34 | 35 | |
| 241 | 152.4B USD | 34 | 62 | |
| 241 | 30.5B USD | 34 | 49 | |
| 241 | 45.3B USD | 34 | 54 | |
| 246 | 2.81T USD | 33 | 58 | |
| 246 | 5.0B USD | 33 | 58 | |
| 246 | 54.9B USD | 33 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score