Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
How Williams-Sonoma, Inc. stacks up
WSM · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,034 of 1,553 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including WSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 3.8% | 4.4% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 5.5% | 8.8% | 29% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 4.5% | 6.1% | 41% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 6.3% | 57.2% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1,034 | 402M AUD (≈$265M) | 33 | 40 | |
| 1,034 | 442M CAD (≈$323M) | 33 | 39 | |
| 1,034 | 8.6B NOK (≈$816M) | 33 | 49 | |
| 1,034 | 4.3B USD | 33 | 40 | |
| 1,034 | 29.9B USD | 33 | 49 | |
| 1,049 | 7.7B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 32 | 64 | |
| 1,049 | 3.1B CNY (≈$429M) | 32 | 50 | |
| 1,049 | 6.8B CNY (≈$953M) | 32 | 76 | |
| 1,049 | 11.0B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 32 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score