Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to W. P. Carey Inc.
How W. P. Carey Inc. stacks up
WPC · against 67 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #23 of 68 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including WPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.5% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WPC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 69 reported | 4.5% | 4.0% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | 6.5% | 5.5% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 43 reported | 8.3% | 5.5% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 69 reported | 58.9% | 55.7% | 54% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WPC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 3 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 4 | 13.7B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 5 | 26.9B USD | 77 | 78 | |
| 19 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.6B) | 65 | 58 | |
| 20 | 13.2B USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 20 | 11.7B AUD (≈$7.8B) | 64 | 58 | |
| 22 | 7.9B USD | 61 | 54 | |
| 23 | 14.7B USD | 59 | 61 | |
| 24 | 9.0B USD | 58 | 52 | |
| 25 | 94.4B HKD (≈$12.1B) | 55 | 52 | |
| 26 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 53 | 63 | |
| 27 | 15.7B USD | 51 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score