Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to UDR, Inc.
How UDR, Inc. stacks up
UDR · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #237 of 663 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score67 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including UDR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.8% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.5% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UDR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UDR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 4.4% | 5.3% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 5.6% | 5.3% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 4.8% | 6.8% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 25.1% | 112.8% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UDR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 230 | 21.2B SEK (≈$2.1B) | 65 | 54 | |
| 237 | 15.0B MYR (≈$3.3B) | 64 | 72 | |
| 237 | 682.7B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 64 | 57 | |
| 237 | 1.8B USD | 64 | 34 | |
| 237 | 13.2B USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 237 | 530M USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 237 | 11.7B AUD (≈$7.8B) | 64 | 58 | |
| 243 | 171.8B INR (≈$2.1B) | 63 | 71 | |
| 243 | 3.0B USD | 63 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score