Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WIT · against 157 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #21 of 158 · scores higher than 87% of peers · safety percentile 72
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)4 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including WIT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WIT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 150 reported | 0.27× | 0.36× | 59% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 152 reported | 0.39 | 1.11 | 93% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 157 reported | 1.67× | 1.63× | 55% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 4 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 17 | 952.5B INR (≈$11.4B) | 81 | 72 | |
| 18 | 27.0B USD | 80 | 55 | |
| 19 | 11.2B USD | 78 | 42 | |
| 20 | 13.3B USD | 75 | 76 | |
| 21 | 21.3B USD | 72 | 59 | |
| 22 | 108.6B CNY (≈$15.2B) | 70 | 55 | |
| 23 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 69 | 85 | |
| 24 | 12.3B EUR (≈$13.6B) | 69 | 55 | |
| 25 | 137.6B CNY (≈$19.3B) | 69 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score