Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FIG · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #368 of 1,698 · scores higher than 78% of peers · safety percentile 78
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including FIG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FIG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.05× | 0.26× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | Not reported | 0.84 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 2.45× | 1.83× | 67% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 364 | 2.9B HKD (≈$375M) | 79 | 36 | |
| 365 | 499M SGD (≈$380M) | 79 | 65 | |
| 366 | 28.6B TWD (≈$887M) | 78 | 63 | |
| 367 | 71.1B CNY (≈$10.0B) | 78 | 56 | |
| 368 | 11.2B USD | 78 | 42 | |
| 369 | 6.3B CNY (≈$876M) | 78 | 49 | |
| 370 | 35.5B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 78 | 54 | |
| 371 | 1.6B CNY (≈$230M) | 78 | 41 | |
| 372 | 42.2B TWD (≈$1.3B) | 78 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score