Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Vistra Corp.
How Vistra Corp. stacks up
VST · against 89 other Utilities companies listed in US-listed
Growth
50/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #70 of 90 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including VST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Utilities peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -6.2% vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 2.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 91 reported | 3.8% | 7.4% | 22% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 76 reported | -6.2% | 2.8% | 25% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 89 reported | 5.3% | 4.0% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 3 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1.5B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 98 | 77 | |
| 66 | 15.5B USD | 52 | 72 | |
| 69 | 18.7B USD | 51 | 37 | |
| 70 | 1.1B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 70 | 6.7B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 70 | 46.9B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 73 | 49.2B USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 74 | 4.9B USD | 48 | 41 | |
| 75 | 5.1B USD | 46 | 75 | |
| 76 | 5.3B USD | 45 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score