Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to VeriSign, Inc.
How VeriSign, Inc. stacks up
VRSN · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #336 of 479 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including VRSN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VRSN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VRSN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 6.9% | 13.1% | 30% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 10.0% | 22.4% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 5.3% | 9.7% | 39% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VRSN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 334 | 6.2B USD | 47 | 53 | |
| 336 | 5.9B USD | 46 | 55 | |
| 336 | 155.8B USD | 46 | 63 | |
| 336 | 32.5B USD | 46 | 43 | |
| 336 | 28.4B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 336 | 15.6B USD | 46 | 48 | |
| 341 | 3.2B USD | 45 | 67 | |
| 341 | 4.2B USD | 45 | 54 | |
| 341 | 5.2B USD | 45 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score