Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VIV · against 508 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #171 of 509 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including VIV · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | VIV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 468 reported | 0.30× | 0.40× | 56% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 497 reported | 0.20 | 0.61 | 84% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 498 reported | 0.95× | 1.37× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B KRW (≈$18M) | 100 | 26 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 5 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 167 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 67 | 19 | |
| 168 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) |
| 67 |
| 74 |
| 169 | 248M USD | 67 | 58 |
| 170 | 509.1B CLP (≈$560M) | 67 | 48 |
| 171 | 17.6B USD | 67 | 64 |
| 172 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 66 | 55 |
| 173 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 66 | 73 |
| 174 | 47.8B KRW (≈$34M) | 66 | 60 |
| 175 | 109M HKD (≈$14M) | 66 | 24 |